In that racket post, the system they describe basically generates html
which you can then upload to a standard blogging service. It looks like
there are some similar pipelines for Haskell
- literate haskell -> hscolor -> markdown
http://passingcuriosity.com/2008/literate-haskell-with-markdown-syntax-hightlighting/
- emacs org mode + htmlize
http://ghc-simd.blogspot.com/2012/03/simd-support-for-vector-library.html
And since it looks like google's command line tools let you upload to
blogger on the command line maybe this workflow is fine.
As long as you have the data offline, I am satisfied. Still, the generated
static pages with a complete snapshot of the blog in github seems
attractive...
-Ryan
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Eric Jiang <> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Ryan Newton <> wrote:
> > I feel like an old man when it comes to the web. This racket blog
> appears
> > to be powered by blogger, but embedded in their website:
> >
> > http://blog.racket-lang.org/2012/04/scribble-your-blogs.html#more
>
> The Racket folks have simply set up blog.racket-lang.org to point to
> Google's servers.
>
> >
> > Has anybody out there tried any of the more hacker-ish alternatives --
> for
> > example using github + jekyll?
> >
> > Some people mention jekyll + Disqus for comments, but I haven't seen
> > anything indicating that Disqus allows downloading/archiving of the data.
> >
>
> I like the idea of using generated static pages with outsourced
> comments, and I've used Disqus on a website before, but I would
> hesitate to trust Disqus with anything valuable. They do have an
> export utility (http://docs.disqus.com/developers/export/) but
> importing that data, of course, is left as an exercise to the reader.
>
> Maybe there are some decent Haskell/Scheme-powered blogging systems
> out there? I know wingolog.org is powered with Scheme + Git.
>
> Eric
>