Texdoc Archive

List Statistics

  • Total Threads: 30
  • Total Posts: 44

Phrases Used to Find This Thread

  #1  
18-04-2011 04:39 PM
Texdoc member admin is online now
User
 


Am 03.02.2011 um 02:03 schrieb Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard:

> Hi Philipp,
>
> Le 03/02/2011 00:15, Philipp Stephani a écrit :
>> since the last update
>
> Let me guess: from tlcontrib?
>
>> `texdoc pgf` shows the documentation for the `pgf-soroban` package instead of
>> the arguably more popular PGF/TikZ bundle:
>>
> This isn't the expected result indeed. The problem is, the comments from the
> catalogue are lost in the tlcontrib package, and they are crucial in making
> pdfmanual the first result.
>
> I'll discuss this issue on the tlcontrib list, and see if we can fix that there.
> Otherwise, I'll try a fix on the texdoc side (the obvious workaround would be to
> add an alias or an adjscore directive).

Hi Manuel,

sorry to bother you again, but the problem seems to persist after the latest batch of updates.

Philipp
)

  #2  
12-05-2011 06:18 PM
Texdoc member admin is online now
User
 


Am 03.02.2011 um 02:03 schrieb Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard:

> Hi Philipp,
>
> Le 03/02/2011 00:15, Philipp Stephani a écrit :
>> since the last update
>
> Let me guess: from tlcontrib?
>
>> `texdoc pgf` shows the documentation for the `pgf-soroban` package instead of
>> the arguably more popular PGF/TikZ bundle:
>>
> This isn't the expected result indeed. The problem is, the comments from the
> catalogue are lost in the tlcontrib package, and they are crucial in making
> pdfmanual the first result.
>
> I'll discuss this issue on the tlcontrib list, and see if we can fix that there.
> Otherwise, I'll try a fix on the texdoc side (the obvious workaround would be to
> add an alias or an adjscore directive).

Hi Manuel,

sorry to bother you again, but the problem seems to persist after the latest batch of updates.

Philipp
)
Le 18/04/2011 17:39, Philipp Stephani a écrit :
> sorry to bother you again,

On the contrary, thanks for the reminder.

> but the problem seems to persist after the latest batch of updates.
>
It looks like it will take some time for the catalogue information to be
included in tlcontrib packages, so I added a workaround in texdoc's config file
for now.

M.
)

  #3  
12-05-2011 07:13 PM
Texdoc member admin is online now
User
 


Am 03.02.2011 um 02:03 schrieb Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard:

> Hi Philipp,
>
> Le 03/02/2011 00:15, Philipp Stephani a écrit :
>> since the last update
>
> Let me guess: from tlcontrib?
>
>> `texdoc pgf` shows the documentation for the `pgf-soroban` package instead of
>> the arguably more popular PGF/TikZ bundle:
>>
> This isn't the expected result indeed. The problem is, the comments from the
> catalogue are lost in the tlcontrib package, and they are crucial in making
> pdfmanual the first result.
>
> I'll discuss this issue on the tlcontrib list, and see if we can fix that there.
> Otherwise, I'll try a fix on the texdoc side (the obvious workaround would be to
> add an alias or an adjscore directive).

Hi Manuel,

sorry to bother you again, but the problem seems to persist after the latest batch of updates.

Philipp
)
Le 18/04/2011 17:39, Philipp Stephani a écrit :
> sorry to bother you again,

On the contrary, thanks for the reminder.

> but the problem seems to persist after the latest batch of updates.
>
It looks like it will take some time for the catalogue information to be
included in tlcontrib packages, so I added a workaround in texdoc's config file
for now.

M.
)

Am 12.05.2011 um 19:18 schrieb Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard:

>> but the problem seems to persist after the latest batch of updates.
>>
> It looks like it will take some time for the catalogue information to be
> included in tlcontrib packages, so I added a workaround in texdoc's config file
> for now.

Thanks.
)





NewsArc Lists  |  Culture Pages   |  Computing Archive  |  Media-Pages
Link to this page on your blog or website by copying the HTML code below and pasting it into your site: